Skip to content
fonteum
DataAPIRisk SignalsResearchCompareSnapshotsRequest access →
Fonteum Care Compare · Nursing Homes

14,699 Medicare-certified nursing homes — CMS overall star rating, staffing data, and Special Focus Facility transparency on every facility.

Per-facility CMS overall star rating, health inspection rating, staffing rating, quality measure rating, ownership type, certified bed counts, and Special Focus Facility / candidate status — every column traced to the CMS Care Compare NH Provider Information source dataset.

See the Audit Pack →
Live snapshot · top 5 states by facility count
StateFacilitiesAvg ★
TX1,1762.70
CA1,1623.18
OH9223.22
FL6943.27
IL6672.56
Browse all 53 states + territories →
Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.Last reviewed: June 2026 · Next review: December 2026 · Data last updated (dataLastUpdated): 2026-05-25About our reviewers →
Bar chart: CMS nursing-home health-inspection citations per cited facility, led by Maryland (51.0), California (49.8), and Washington (49.4); snapshot 2026-05-25.
Source: CMS Care Compare — Nursing Home Health Deficiencies (data.cms.gov) · snapshot 2026-05-25.
  • Deficiency analysis
  • Methodology
  • Source comparison
  • FAQ
  • Sources
Data sourcesProvenance chainData freshnessEditorial policyMethodology
Primary federal sources:CMS data.cms.gov ↗OIG oig.hhs.gov ↗CMS cms.gov ↗
Snapshot May 7, 2026·14,699 Medicare-certified nursing homes · 53 states + territories · 85 Special Focus Facilities + 441 candidates·CMS Care Compare — NH Provider Info (4pq5-n9py) + CMS POS File·Methodology →·Audit Pack →·Check at Medicare.gov → ↗
Source-published 2026-04-29 · Star ratings refresh quarterly · CCN format: 6-char TEXT, leading zeros preserved
Headline figure

85 nursing homes carry CMS's Special Focus Facility designation in the current snapshot, plus 441 SFF candidates — facilities CMS has flagged for repeat health-inspection deficiencies. The SFF list is published quarterly and is the most-actionable consumer-facing quality signal in the dataset.

Source: CMS Care Compare · NH Provider Info (4pq5-n9py) · Published 2026-04-29 · Snapshot 2026-05-07.

National coverage

Medicare-Certified Nursing Homes

Every SNF + NF in the CMS Care Compare NH Provider Information dataset (4pq5-n9py) — identity, ownership, certification, bed counts, star ratings.

14,699
Staffing

Overall + Component ★

CMS Overall, Health Inspection, Staffing, and Quality Measures ratings (1–5 ★ each), plus Reported RN HPRD and total nurse HPRD per resident per day from the PBJ daily nurse staffing dataset.

5 ratings
Enforcement

Special Focus Facilities

Active SFF designations + 441 candidates flagged. CMS publishes the SFF list quarterly; Fonteum surfaces it as a per-facility column, not a footnote.

85
Featured research

Federal data gap on nursing home ownership won't close — and Fonteum maps what CMS doesn't.

82.40%Source: https://data.cms.gov/provider-characteristics/hospitals-and-other-facilities/skilled-nursing-facility-all-owners · Dataset: cms-snf-all-owners/v1 · Snapshot: 2026-05-01
of CMS top-10-chain ownership percentages are missing in the CMS SNF All Owners dataset. The Trump administration suspended the mechanism that was supposed to close the gap. PE-owned nursing homes face higher resident mortality and greater bankruptcy risk.

Top-10-chain ownership gap
Medicare lives lost (PE NH)
PE NH bankruptcy risk
Read the full study →
State coverage — top 10 by facility count

53 states + territories with Medicare-certified nursing homes

Every state with enough Medicare-certified nursing homes to report has its own page; the data is also in the snapshot and audit-pack export.

Nursing homes by state
  • Alabama
  • Alaska
  • Arizona
  • Arkansas
  • Colorado
  • Connecticut
  • Delaware
  • Florida
  • Georgia
  • Hawaii
  • Idaho
  • Illinois
  • Indiana
  • Iowa
  • Kansas
  • Kentucky
  • Louisiana
  • Maine
  • Maryland
  • Michigan
  • Minnesota
  • Mississippi
  • Missouri
  • Montana
  • Nebraska
  • Nevada
  • New Hampshire
  • New Jersey
  • New Mexico
  • North Carolina
  • North Dakota
  • Ohio
  • Oklahoma
  • Oregon
  • Pennsylvania
  • Rhode Island
  • South Carolina
  • South Dakota
  • Tennessee
  • Texas
  • Utah
  • Vermont
  • Virginia
  • Washington
  • West Virginia
  • Wisconsin
  • Wyoming
StateFacilitiesAvg ★
TX1,1762.70
CA1,1623.18
OH9223.22
FL6943.27
IL6672.56
PA6573.02
NY5963.05
IN5073.15
MO4872.49
MI4233.18
Cross-reference: Sanctions / OIG LEIE

Federal healthcare exclusions for individual practitioners and entities. The LEIE × NH Provider Information cross-join is the audit-pack export endpoint's compliance signal — when a CCN's owners or staff appear in LEIE, the audit-pack envelope flags it explicitly.

See the OIG LEIE surface →
Original analysis · health-inspection deficiencies

What CMS health inspections found, at facility grain

Across the current snapshot, CMS state-survey teams recorded

418,148Source: https://data.cms.gov/provider-data/topics/nursing-homes · Dataset: cms-nh-health-deficiencies/v1 · Snapshot: 2026-05-25
health-deficiency citations against Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing homes, from surveys conducted between 2017-03-23 and 2026-03-25. Most citations describe a potential for harm; a minority describe proven injury. Fonteum keeps every citation at its facility (CMS Certification Number) and survey date — the grain a national average erases.

5.59%
Citations at actual-harm or immediate-jeopardy level (23,375 of 418,148)
9,862
Immediate-jeopardy citations (scope-severity J–L), 2.36% of all citations
31.28%
Complaint-driven citations (130,804) — filed after a resident or family complaint
1,490
Infection-control citations — a distinct CMS deficiency flag

Inspection density by state — top 6 of 50+ jurisdictions

Citation density measures how many deficiencies each cited facility carries — a function of both care quality and how aggressively a state surveys. Maryland and California record the most citations per facility; their harm-level share differs sharply, which is why the raw count alone never tells the story.

StateCitationsCited facilitiesPer facilityHarm-level %
MD11,21922051.001.86%
CA57,8991,16249.832.63%
WA9,57519449.364.38%
NM3,3316848.994.59%
WV5,30512343.133.15%
VA11,01928738.393.48%

Related Fonteum data: the Payroll-Based Journal staffing dataset pairs each facility's deficiencies with its nurse hours per resident-day, and the SNF ownership records link citations to the chains and investors behind a facility. Federal exclusions appear on the OIG sanctions surface.

Source: CMS Care Compare — NH Health Deficiencies (data.cms.gov)·Last checked: 2026-05-25·signed badge ↗
Data provenance

Methodology

Figures are computed directly from CMS primary files — not from an aggregator. The pipeline runs in five stages: (1) source acquisition from data.cms.gov, (2) entity resolution on the CMS Certification Number, (3) survey-date join across the deficiency and provider-information files, (4) quality checks against published CMS row counts, and (5) chain attestation. Each value is asserted and chained, then labeled with its provenance — attested, signed, or provenance-tracked — never with unbacked trust language.

dataset_id
cms-nh-health-deficiencies/v1
source_agency
CMS (data.cms.gov)
snapshot_date
2026-05-25
methodology_version
care-compare-nh/v1

These four headline fields are the start of the 14-tuple provenance chain. The full 14-field contract — through entity_id, confidence_tier, chain_link_hash, and attested_at — is documented on the Care Compare nursing-home methodology page.

How this data is measured

Source comparison: grain, cadence, and access

The same CMS files underlie most nursing-home data products. What differs is the grain you can reach, how often it refreshes, and whether a machine — or an AI system — can cite it.

SourceData grainCadenceAccessProvenance
FonteumFacility-level (CCN)MonthlyFree, machine-readable14-tuple chain
CMS Care CompareFacility-levelMonthlyFree, one facility at a timeNone (raw file)
Definitive HealthcareFacility / systemAnnualPaid subscriptionNone
AHRQState / nationalAnnualResearch requestNone
Frequently asked questions

Nursing home data — common questions

How many US nursing homes have been cited for health deficiencies?
CMS health-inspection surveys recorded 418,148 deficiency citations across 14,635 Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing homes in the current snapshot, covering surveys from March 2017 through March 2026. Each citation names a specific facility by CMS Certification Number, with its survey date, regulatory tag, and scope-severity letter.
What share of nursing home deficiencies involve actual harm or immediate jeopardy?
Of 418,148 citations, 23,375 (5.59%) carry a scope-severity code of G through L, meaning actual harm or immediate jeopardy to residents. Of those, 9,862 reached immediate-jeopardy level (codes J, K, or L), the most serious category CMS assigns. The remainder reflect potential for harm without a proven injury.
Which states cite nursing homes most often?
Maryland leads at 51.0 citations per cited facility, followed by California (49.8), Washington (49.4), New Mexico (49.0), and West Virginia (43.1). High citation density reflects inspection intensity as much as care quality: more aggressive state survey programs record more findings per facility. Fonteum publishes the per-facility detail behind every state figure.
What is a Special Focus Facility?
A Special Focus Facility is a nursing home CMS has flagged for a persistent pattern of serious health-inspection deficiencies. CMS publishes the SFF list and a candidate list quarterly. Flagged facilities must show sustained improvement or face termination from Medicare and Medicaid. Fonteum renders SFF status as a per-facility column, not a footnote.
How current is Fonteum's nursing home data?
This page reflects the CMS Care Compare snapshot dated May 25, 2026, with health-inspection surveys spanning March 2017 through March 2026. CMS refreshes star ratings monthly and the deficiency file on a rolling basis; Fonteum re-pulls the source on the same cadence. Every figure carries its snapshot date in the provenance strip.
How does Fonteum's nursing home data differ from Medicare's Care Compare?
Both draw from the same CMS primary files, but Medicare Care Compare shows one facility at a time with no bulk export and no provenance trail. Fonteum publishes facility-level data in machine-readable form, free, with a 14-tuple chain of custody linking each number to its CMS dataset, snapshot date, and methodology version.
Can I trace a specific nursing home statistic back to its source?
Yes. Every quantitative claim on this page links to a provenance record naming the CMS dataset, the issuing agency, the snapshot date, and the methodology version. You can cross-check any facility at Medicare.gov Care Compare or download the underlying CMS deficiency file from data.cms.gov. Nothing here is asserted without a traceable source.
Primary sources

Sources

  1. Nursing Home — Provider Information (4pq5-n9py) — Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Monthly. Primary source ↗ · Archive ↗
    Used for: Facility identity, ownership, certification, bed counts, star ratings, SFF status.
  2. Nursing Home — Health Deficiencies — Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Monthly (rolling). Primary source ↗ · Archive ↗
    Used for: Survey-level deficiency citations: regulatory tag, scope-severity, harm flag, correction status.
  3. Payroll-Based Journal — Daily Nurse Staffing — Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Quarterly. Primary source ↗ · Archive ↗
    Used for: RN / LPN / CNA hours per resident-day used in the CMS staffing star rating.
  4. Medicare Care Compare — Nursing Homes — U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS), Monthly. Primary source ↗ · Archive ↗
    Used for: Consumer-facing source of record for cross-checking any single facility.

Data last updated: 2026-05-25 · Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD · June 2026. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Compliance posture

Methodology · Corrections log · Editorial policy

Compliance posture

Methodology · Corrections log · Editorial policy

fonteum

Product

  • Data
  • API
  • Methodology
  • Sources
  • Freshness
  • Citations
  • Moat metrics

For buyers

  • AI agents
  • RAG developers
  • Compliance
  • Researchers
  • Developers

Reference

  • Compare
  • llms.txt
  • Agent card
  • Audit pack
  • Quality scorecard
  • Pilot intake
  • Research
  • Press & media

Sourced from federal agencies. Fonteum, Inc., Delaware C-corp. © 2026.

Fonteum is a US healthcare provenance registry.

About Fonteum ›

Fonteum is a US healthcare provenance registry that publishes signed, chain-of-custody-attested research and data pages on Medicare, Medicaid, and federal regulator datasets, drawing from 22 federal source families across CMS, OIG, HRSA, AHRQ, and HHS.

Request access→
1,322,867 nurse-staffing records · CMS PBJ